Wednesday, November 19, 2025

Part II — The Constitutional Lessons of 1621 for America in 2025

The real history of the 1621 harvest gathering reveals something Americans rarely consider: three identities — Wampanoag, Separatist, and non-Separatist English — sharing a place but not a constitution. America began not with unity, but with contradiction. And 2025 shows we still have not resolved it.

1. America Has Always Lived With Misaligned Identities

The Mayflower groups carried conflicting assumptions:

Separatists sought a religious community of their own.

Non-Separatists wanted economic opportunity under English law.

The Wampanoag acted from sovereign authority on their land.

The Crown expected loyalty.

The Mayflower Compact was a temporary fix, not a constitution.


They began with identity instability, and the same pattern appears today. Our governance reflects that.


2. Who we are Constitutionally shifts when the Constitution is violated

When the settlers drafted the Compact outside their patent, they weren’t just breaking rules. They were changing identity. They were no longer acting purely as English subjects; they became something undefined.

This is the lesson for 2025:

When a nation tolerates unconstitutional behavior, it is not simply allowing violations — it is adopting a different identity.

Identity drift, not legal disagreement, is the core of our crisis.


3. The Crisis of 2025 Mirrors the Crisis of 1621

Today we see:

officials treating limits as optional

citizens viewing violations as partisan

institutions waiting to be “called upon”

groups claiming incompatible constitutional identities


Plymouth shows that without shared authority, a society loses its constitutional center. We are in that moment again.

4. Improvisation Is a Warning, Not a Foundation

The Mayflower Compact is remembered as the start of self-government, but it existed because the settlers:

landed outside authorization,

lacked a shared foundation, and

needed a temporary structure to avoid collapse.


Improvisation saved them, but it is not sustainable. Today, the U.S. is improvising again — stretching norms, redefining powers, and treating obligations as negotiable.


5. Stability Requires Identity Before Fidelity

A constitution cannot function when the identity of the people bound by it is fractured.

Americans treat constitutional violations as political acts. But the Constitution describes identity. Every violation signals an attempt to become a different people.

We now see a struggle between those holding the 1787 identity and those acting under a new, undefined one.


The Lesson for 2025

America is not in crisis because the Constitution is weak. America is struggling because its identity is unstable.

The real question of 2025 is whether we can agree on who we are.

If identity is lost, fidelity cannot exist. And without fidelity, force becomes the default.


No comments: