by Darius A. Lecointe, PhD, JD
The United States has survived repeated constitutional crises not because our institutions are strong, but because something deeper operates beneath them. I call it the Hydraulic Constitutional Force (HCF) — the natural, self-correcting mechanism built into constitutional systems. It appears whenever identity fractures, governance fails, or fidelity collapses. It is the Constitution’s way of restoring equilibrium, and istory has recorded it again and again.
1. The HCF Appears When Institutions Do Not
When institutions refuse to act, the HCF creates pressure they cannot ignore.
Hayburn’s Case showed judges stepping outside procedure to warn the President that a statute violated the Constitution. They did not “wait for a case” because fidelity required immediate action. The Court yielded to the Constitution’s self-correcting force.
Similarly, in Trump v. Thompson, the D.C. Circuit described how their ruling was responsive to this self-correcting force.
2. The HCF Exposes Identity Drift
The force emerges most visibly when Americans behave as though they are no longer bound by a shared identity.
Identity drift produces conflict, and conflict triggers self-correction.
2025 is seeing the same pattern. Competing identities are placing pressure on institutions that can no longer ignore the imbalance.
3. The HCF Limits Human Will
The Constitution was built to resist domination by individual will — whether of a president, a court, or a faction. The HCF activates whenever will threatens identity.
This is why Marbury’s principle matters: acts repugnant to the Constitution are void because the Constitution is sovereign, not the actors within it.
The HCF ensures that human will cannot permanently override constitutional identity.
4. The HCF Does Not Prevent Crisis — It Prevents Collapse
Contrary to popular belief, the Constitution is not designed to prevent crisis. It is designed to ensure crisis does not become destruction.
The HCF intervenes through: public reaction, institutional pushback, structural limits, and moments where the system simply refuses to bend further.
We see this now in the growing rejection of judicial supremacy, the renewed debate over the Oath, and the public recognition that constitutional violations signal identity change.
America’s challenge is to respond before the pressure becomes force.
The Path Forward
If we ignore identity, the HCF will continue to push through conflict and instability.
If we recover identity, the system will stabilize without coercion.
The choice in 2025 is whether we align with the force — or resist it until it acts on us.
No comments:
Post a Comment